![]() We additionally obtain an accurate description of the “tails” of quantum work distributions, which correspond to values of work that are classically forbidden. If the interference patterns are ignored, then a classical result is recovered. ![]() In effect, if there are multiple pathways over which a classical particle can arrive at a particular final energy given an initial energy, then the quantum work includes contributions from all these paths and gives rise to patterns similar to those arising from the interference between diffracted waves. ![]() We show that this definition leads to quantum work distributions that can be understood as interference patterns between classical trajectories. Quantum work is often defined as the difference between the results of initial and final energy measurements. Even so, defining quantum work has proven to be challenging given the strange characteristic of quantum mechanics in which the very act of observing a system can dramatically change its state. This interest is motivated both by theoretical progress describing how the laws of thermodynamics apply to small systems and by experimental advances in the control of individual atoms and molecules. In recent years, there has been growing interest in properly defining the amount of work performed on a quantum system that is manipulated by externally applied forces. Work also plays a central role in the field of thermodynamics, but the concept is notably absent from most texts on quantum mechanics. Introductory physics textbooks define work as the energy required to move an object against an opposing force. Our results clarify how the correspondence principle applies in the context of quantum and classical work distributions and contribute to the understanding of work and nonequilibrium work relations in the quantum regime. We also derive the form of the quantum work distribution at the boundary between classically allowed and forbidden regions, where this distribution tunnels into the forbidden region. Hence, in the semiclassical limit, the quantum work distribution converges to the classical distribution, decorated by a quantum interference pattern. Neglecting the interferences between trajectories reduces the distribution to that of the corresponding classical process. We find that a semiclassical work distribution, built from classical trajectories that connect the initial and final energies, provides an excellent approximation to the quantum work distribution when the trajectories are assigned suitable phases and are allowed to interfere. In this paper, we employ semiclassical methods, combined with numerical simulations of a driven quartic oscillator, to study the correspondence between classical and quantal definitions of work in systems with 1 degree of freedom. While this two-point measurement definition of quantum work can be justified heuristically by appeal to the first law of thermodynamics, its relationship to the classical definition of work has not been carefully examined. This definition leads to statistical distributions of work that satisfy nonequilibrium work and fluctuation relations. For closed quantum systems driven away from equilibrium, work is often defined in terms of projective measurements of initial and final energies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |